Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Cover Note B1526MACAR1800089 v. TCSL, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20204:19-cv-02945California3,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S SUBSCRIBING TO COVER NOTE Case No. 19-cv-02945-PJH B1526MACAR1800089,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 56 ABAXIS, INC., et al., Defendants.

14 Before the court is cross-defendant’s C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.’s (“CHR” or “cross-defendant”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND The underlying complaint (“Compl.”) in this action was filed by plaintiff Underwriters at Lloyd’s Subscribing to Cover Note B1526MACAR1800089 (“Underwriters” or “plaintiff”) on May 29, 2019. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff is a group of insurers who insured Covetrus Inc. and its corporate predecessors Henry Schein Animal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.