Nguyen

Nguyen v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20205:20-cv-00681California832 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 TIEN NGUYEN, Case No. 20-CV-00681-LHK

13 Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

14 v.

15 R. NEUSHMID, 16 Respondent. 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner has paid the filing fee for this action. See Dkt. No. 7. 20 For the reasons that follow, the Court orders respondent to show cause why the petition 21 should not be granted. 22 DISCUSSION 23 A. Standard of Review 24 This Court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in 25 custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in 26 violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose v. 27 Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). 1 A district court shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show 2 cause why the writ should not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.