Nguyen

Nguyen v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20205:20-cv-00681California832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TIEN NGUYEN, Case No. 20-CV-00681-LHK

Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

R. NEUSHMID, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner has paid the filing fee for this action. See Dkt. No. 7. For the reasons that follow, the Court orders respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review This Court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). A district court shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.