Smith v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20204:20-cv-00911California1,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA CANTU SMITH, Case No. 20-cv-00911-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND

FCA US LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant.

13 Before the court is plaintiff Maria Cantu Smith’s motion to remand. The matter is fully briefed1 and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND On January 2, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint (“Compl.”) in Alameda County Superior Court alleging warranty claims for a defective vehicle. Dkt. 1-1. Plaintiff seeks a refund for the purchase price of a motor vehicle pursuant to the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1794. Id. Defendant FCA US LLC (“defendant”) was served on January 7, 2020. Id. Defendant then filed a notice of removal and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.