Marshall
Marshall v. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 CARRIE A. MARSHALL, Case No. 19-cv-00306-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 23 Defendant.
The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. Based upon my review of the parties’ papers and the administrative record, I GRANT plaintiff Carrie A. Marshall’s motion, DENY the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Order. BACKGROUND I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Marshall filed a Title XVI application for supplemental security benefits and a Title II application for disability benefits. Administrative Record (AR) 70, 71. Her claims were denied initially and on reconsideration. AR 114, 132. Marshall requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) on April 25, 2016. AR 149. That hearing was held on August 4, 2017, before ALJ…