Marshall

Marshall v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20203:19-cv-00306California8,831 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CARRIE A. MARSHALL, Case No. 19-cv-00306-WHO

5 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

6 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 23 Defendant. 8

9 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. 10 Based upon my review of the parties’ papers and the administrative record, I GRANT plaintiff 11 Carrie A. Marshall’s motion, DENY the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion, and remand 12 for further proceedings consistent with this Order. 13 BACKGROUND 14 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 15 Marshall filed a Title XVI application for supplemental security benefits and a Title II 16 application for disability benefits. Administrative Record (AR) 70, 71. Her claims were denied 17 initially and on reconsideration. AR 114, 132. Marshall requested a hearing before an 18 Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) on April 25, 2016. AR 149. That hearing was held on August 19 4, 2017, before ALJ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.