Sobaszkiewicz
Sobaszkiewicz v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 HERMAN OVERPECK, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07553-PJH 8 Plaintiffs,
9 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE
10 FEDEX CORPORATION, et al., PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 103 12
13 14 Before the court is defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s (“FedEx 15 Ground” or “defendant”) motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and 16 Civil Local Rule 72-2 for relief from a discovery order issued by Magistrate Judge Ryu. 17 Plaintiffs Herman Overpeck, Kevin Sterling, and Shannon Sobaszkiewicz (“plaintiffs”) 18 have not filed a response. 19 A district court’s review of a magistrate judge’s pretrial order is conducted under a 20 “clearly erroneous” or “contrary to law standard.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). A magistrate 21 judge’s resolution of a discovery dispute is “entitled to great deference.” Doubt v. NCR 22 Corp., No. 09-cv-5917-SBA, 2011 WL 5914284, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011). A 23 district court…