Sobaszkiewicz

Sobaszkiewicz v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20204:18-cv-07553California307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERMAN OVERPECK, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07553-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE

FEDEX CORPORATION, et al., PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 103

13 Before the court is defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s (“FedEx Ground” or “defendant”) motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and Civil Local Rule 72-2 for relief from a discovery order issued by Magistrate Judge Ryu. Plaintiffs Herman Overpeck, Kevin Sterling, and Shannon Sobaszkiewicz (“plaintiffs”) have not filed a response. A district court’s review of a magistrate judge’s pretrial order is conducted under a “clearly erroneous” or “contrary to law standard.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). A magistrate judge’s resolution of a discovery dispute is “entitled to great deference.” Doubt v. NCR Corp., No. 09-cv-5917-SBA, 2011 WL 5914284, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011). A district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.