Uberti

Uberti v. Sonoma County Board of Supervisors

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20203:19-cv-04025California518 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9

10 GEORGE UBERTI, 11 Plaintiff, Case No. C 19-04025 WHA

12 v.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

13 VALERIE BROWN et. al, MOTION TO STAY 14 Defendants.

15

16 In this Sherman Act action against a County, pro se plaintiff moves to stay this Court’s 17 February 21 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying plaintiff’s motion for 18 summary judgment. 19 Plaintiff George Uberti alleged Sherman Act violations by Sonoma County government 20 officials and employees Valerie Brown, Susan Gorin, Michael Kerns, David Rabbitt, Timothy 21 Smith, Shirlee Zane, Paul Kelley, Michael McGuire, James Gore, Michael Reilly, Efren Carrillo, 22 Lynda Hopkins, Rodney Dole, Donna Dunk, David Sundstrom, Erick Roeser, Robert Boitano, 23 and Jonathan Kadlec (“defendants”) following the County’s consolidation of the Auditor- 24 Controller and the Treasurer-Tax Collector into a single operational office (Dkt. No. 42). The 25 consolidation was blessed by state legislation permitting such governmental action. Following 26 briefing and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.