Raudez

Raudez v. SSMB Pacific Holding Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20205:19-cv-02755California423 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 JEREMY RAUDEZ, Case No. 19-cv-02755 NC 11 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

12 v. FOR DISMISSAL AND

TERMINATING CASE IN

13 SSMB PACIFIC HOLDING ACCORDANCE WITH

COMPANY, INC., SETTLEMENT

14 Defendant. 15 16 This is a wrongful termination, failure to provide breaks, and failure to pay wages 17 case filed by Jeremy Raudez against his employer NorCal Kenworth/SSMB Pacific 18 Holding Company, Inc. Raudez was employed as a counterman until he was terminated 19 from employment on January 11, 2019. This case was initially filed in Santa Clara County 20 Superior Court and then removed to this Court. ECF 1. One of Raudez’s claims is under 21 the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Federal jurisdiction is satisfied because a 22 federal statutory claim (the FLSA) is in dispute and all parties have consented to the 23 jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. ECF 5, 8. 24 Presented to the Court is a stipulation for dismissal of the entire action with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.