Teradata Corporation v. SAP SE

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20203:18-cv-03670California795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERADATA CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03670-WHO (JCS)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. ISSUE LETTERS OF REQUEST

SAP SE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 2 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Teradata Corporation; Teradata US, Inc.; and Teradata Operations, Inc. (collectively, “Teradata”) ask the Court to issue letters of request under the Hague Convention to take discovery in Germany from non-party Infolytics AG and certain of its employees. Defendants SAP SE; SAP of America, Inc.; and SAP Labs, LLC (collectively, “SAP”) seek changes to the proposed letters of request, arguing that Teradata’s synopsis of the case is biased and that SAP should be entitled to equal time in any depositions taken pursuant to the letters. “[B]ecause the letter rogatory constitutes a request from the Court for assistance, not from a party, care should be taken to ensure that the synopsis of the case is not unduly argumentative, or state or suggest that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.