Brodsky

Brodsky v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20205:19-cv-00712California14,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JAY BRODSKY, et al., Case No. 19-CV-00712-LHK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 46 APPLE INC., Defendant. 17 Plaintiffs Jay Brodsky, Brian Tracey, Alex Bishop, Brendan Schwartz, William Richardson, and John Kyslowsky (“Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) for alleged privacy and property violations based on Apple’s two-factor authentication login tool. The Court previously granted Apple’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), but granted Plaintiffs leave to amend. ECF No. 40 (“Order”). Currently before the Court is Apple’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 46 (“Mot.”). Because the SAC fails to cure deficiencies previously identified

1 Apple’s motion to dismiss contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.