Brodsky

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 JAY BRODSKY, et al., Case No. 19-CV-00712-LHK

13 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

14 v. Re: Dkt. No. 46 15 APPLE INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiffs Jay Brodsky, Brian Tracey, Alex Bishop, Brendan Schwartz, William 19 Richardson, and John Kyslowsky (“Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant 20 Apple Inc. (“Apple”) for alleged privacy and property violations based on Apple’s two-factor 21 authentication login tool. The Court previously granted Apple’s motion to dismiss the First 22 Amended Complaint (“FAC”), but granted Plaintiffs leave to amend. ECF No. 40 (“Order”). 23 Currently before the Court is Apple’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint 24 (“SAC”). ECF No. 46 (“Mot.”).1 Because the SAC fails to cure deficiencies previously identified 25

26 1 Apple’s motion to dismiss contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the…