Jennings

Bahena Ortuno v. Jennings

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20203:20-cv-02064California3,331 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SOFIA BAHENA ORTUÑO, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02064-MMC

9 Petitioners-Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: PETITIONERS' MOTION 10 v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES

11 DAVID JENNINGS, et al.,

Respondents-Defendants. 12

13 14 Before the Court is petitioners' Motion, filed March 24, 2020, for a Temporary 15 Restraining Order, by which they seek an order releasing them from detention. 16 Respondents have filed opposition, to which petitioners have replied; in addition, with 17 leave of court, respondents have filed two supplemental declarations, to which petitioners 18 have filed their objections. 19 Having read and considered the above-referenced filings,1 the Court rules as 20 follows to the extent the motion is brought on behalf of all petitioners other than Olvin 21 Said Torres Murillo and Mauricio Ernesto Quinteros Lopez, as to whom the Court, for the 22 reasons stated in its order of April 3, 2020, has deferred ruling pending further briefing. 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.