Johnson, Jr. v. Maguire Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20203:18-cv-00366California2,471 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARVESTER J. JOHNSON, JR., Case No. 18-cv-00366-WHO

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

14 R. RECORDER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendants. 15

16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Larvester Johnson alleges in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit that his jailors at Maguire 19 Correctional Facility violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights by placing him in administrative 20 segregation without due process. Defendants Rachel Recoder, a Sheriff’s Correctional Officer, 21 and Julie Costa, a Sheriff’s Sergeant, move for summary judgment and have presented supporting 22 evidence. The motion is unopposed. Johnson has not filed an opposition and never asked to 23 extend the filing deadline. Because the undisputed material facts show that Johnson’s placement 24 in administrative segregation was constitutional, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is 25 GRANTED. 26 27 1 DISCUSSION 2 I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.