Meadows

Meadows v. American Addiction Centers, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20205:18-cv-03291California1,005 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6

WILLIE R. MEADOWS,

7 Case No. 18-cv-03291-BLF Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER VACATING APRIL 16, 2020 9 HEARING ON MOTION TO

AMERICAN ADDICTION CENTERS, INTERVENE; GRANTING MOTION

10 INC., TO INTERVENE; AUTHORIZING

FILING OF COMPLAINT IN

11 Defendant. INTERVENTION; AND SETTING

DEADLINE FOR STATUS REPORT RE

12 FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS

ACTION COMPLAINT

13 [Re: ECF 41] 14 15

16 17 Having determined that the Motion to Intervene (ECF 41) filed by Proposed Intervenor 18 Caroline Park (“Park”) is appropriate for disposition without a hearing, the Court VACATES the 19 hearing set for April 16, 2020. Park’s motion is GRANTED for the reasons discussed below. 20 Plaintiff Willie R. Meadows (“Meadows”) filed this putative class action in the Santa Clara 21 County Superior Court on April 27, 2018, asserting claims against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.