Chang
Chang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANNIE CHANG, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01973-HSG
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND
GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO
9 v. DISMISS
10 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 37 11 Defendant.
12 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo” or “Defendant”) moves to dismiss this 13 putative class action complaint (Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”)) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Dkt. No. 14 37 (“Mot.”). Briefing on the motion is complete. Dkt. No. 46 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 49 (“Reply”). 15 Annie Chang, Tiger Chang Investments, LLC, Asians Investing in Real Estate, LLC, 16 Melanie Gonzales, Gary Gonzales, and G&M You-Nique Property LLC (“Plaintiffs”) allege three 17 causes of action: (1) Aiding and Abetting Fraud; (2) Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary 18 Duty, and (3) Negligence. Compl. at ¶¶ 143-176. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES 19 Defendant’s motion to dismiss as to (1) Aiding and Abetting Fraud and (2) Aiding and Abetting 20 Breach of…