Chang

Chang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20204:19-cv-01973California6,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANNIE CHANG, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01973-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 37 Defendant.

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo” or “Defendant”) moves to dismiss this putative class action complaint (Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”)) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Dkt. No. 37 (“Mot.”). Briefing on the motion is complete. Dkt. No. 46 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 49 (“Reply”). Annie Chang, Tiger Chang Investments, LLC, Asians Investing in Real Estate, LLC, Melanie Gonzales, Gary Gonzales, and G&M You-Nique Property LLC (“Plaintiffs”) allege three causes of action: (1) Aiding and Abetting Fraud; (2) Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and (3) Negligence. Compl. at ¶¶ 143-176. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss as to (1) Aiding and Abetting Fraud and (2) Aiding and Abetting Breach of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.