Salud

Salud v. Expeditors International

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20204:18-cv-01677California4,975 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REGINA SALUD, CASE NO. 18-cv-01677-YGR

11 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

12 vs. IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

13 EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 69, 71 14 Defendant.

15 Plaintiff Regina Salud brings the instant employment discrimination and wrongful 16 termination action against her former employer of 17 years, defendant Expeditors International 17 (“Expeditors”), alleging claims for: (1) wrongful termination/abusive discharge in violation of 18 public policy; (2) violation of California Labor Code section 1102.5; (3) age discrimination in 19 violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t. Code §§ 12940 et seq.; 20 (4) retaliation in violation of FEHA; and (5) failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation in 21 violation of FEHA. 22 Now before the court is Expeditors’ motion for summary judgment on all claims and on 23 plaintiff’s request for punitive damages. Having carefully considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.