Brooke
Brooke v. Rihh LP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 19-cv-06852-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
RIHH LP, Dkt. No. 17 Defendant.
14 On March 16, 2020, Defendant RIHH LP filed the instant motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. 17 (Motion to Dismiss). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) the Court hereby vacates the April 17, 2020, hearing. The motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. 19 BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed in the Court’s February 18, 2020 order granting in part and denying in part defendant’s motion to dismiss. See Dkt. No. 11 (Order on Motion to Dismiss). The Court incorporates that discussion herein. Plaintiff filed her FAC on February 28, 2020 alleging claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California Unruh Act. Dkt. No.…