In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG
LITIGATION
ORDER REGARDING ASUS’S AND
PHILIPS’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL This Document Relates To: SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT MOTIONS
ALL ACTIONS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 724, 751, 711, 713, 766, 742
12 13 On this date, the Court entered an Order, under seal, that granted in part and denied in part ASUS’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 724) and denied Philips’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 751). The Court separately entered an Order, under seal, addressing the parties’ Daubert motions. Dkt. Nos. 711, 713, 766, 742. Each of these Orders contains information the parties sought to be sealed in their briefing. In light of the “strong presumption in favor of [public] access,” the Court will file an unsealed version of these Orders no later than May 13, 2020. See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d…