Ambercroft Trading Limited v. Chris Biddy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20203:19-cv-06810California4,809 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 AMBERCROFT TRADING LIMITED, Case No. 19-CV-06810-LHK et al., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING

14 v. AS MOOT MOTIONS TO DISMISS;

AND STAYING CASE

15 CHRIS BIDDY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 18 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court are Defendants Astro Digital US, Inc., Astro Digital, Inc., and Chris 19 Biddy’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13; Defendants’ Mikhail Kokorich and Liudmila Kokorich’s 20 motion to compel arbitration, ECF No. 15; and Defendants’ Mikhail Kokorich and Liudmila 21 Kokorich’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the 22 relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration, 23 DENIES as moot the motions to dismiss, and STAYS the case. 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff Dmitri Kushaev (“Kushaev”) is a citizen of Russia currently residing in 26 Switzerland and is the beneficial owner and manager of Plaintiff Ambercroft Trading…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.