Galinis
Galinis v. Bayer Corporation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 SUSAN GALINIS, et al., Case No. 09-cv-04980-SI (RMI)
9 Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS TO
10 v. ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
11 BAYER CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 193, 201 12 Defendants.
13 14 Now pending before the court are dueling motions to enforce a settlement agreement filed 15 by both parties, as well as a motion for sanctions filed by Plaintiffs. On October 11, 2019, the 16 parties agreed to a settlement of this case, the terms of which were placed on the record. See (dkt. 17 170); see also Transcript (“Tr.”) (dkt. 207 *SEALED*). Later that day, the Parties jointly filed a 18 Statement of Settlement (dkt. 169), through which they confirmed that they had arrived at an 19 agreement as to all material terms for all matters in controversy. Id. at 3. Thereafter, in February of 20 2020, Plaintiffs and Defendants (“Bayer”) both filed motions to enforce the settlement agreement. 21 (dkts. 193, 201). For the…