Galinis

Galinis v. Bayer Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20203:09-cv-04980California3,681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 SUSAN GALINIS, et al., Case No. 09-cv-04980-SI (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS TO

v. ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT

BAYER CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 193, 201 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court are dueling motions to enforce a settlement agreement filed by both parties, as well as a motion for sanctions filed by Plaintiffs. On October 11, 2019, the parties agreed to a settlement of this case, the terms of which were placed on the record. See (dkt. 170); see also Transcript (“Tr.”) (dkt. 207 *SEALED*). Later that day, the Parties jointly filed a Statement of Settlement (dkt. 169), through which they confirmed that they had arrived at an agreement as to all material terms for all matters in controversy. Id. at 3. Thereafter, in February of 2020, Plaintiffs and Defendants (“Bayer”) both filed motions to enforce the settlement agreement. (dkts. 193, 201). For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.