Brooke
Brooke v. Rihh LP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 19-cv-06852-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. SANCTIONS
RIHH LP, Dkt. No. 22 Defendant.
12 On February 19, 2020, plaintiff filed a notice with the Court (the “First Notice”), to which defendant objected. Dkt. No. 12 (Notice); Dkt. No. 13 (Objections). The Court entered an order on February 28, 2020 striking the First Notice as improper because it did not fall into any category of filings listed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Northern District Civil Local Rules. Dkt. No. 14 at 1 (Order). On March 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed another notice (the “Second Notice”) and, again, defendant objected. Dkt. No. 18 (Notice); Dkt. No. 19 (Objection). On March 26, 2020, the Court entered an order again striking plaintiff’s Second Notice as improper. Dkt. No. 20 (Order). On March 29, 2020, defendant filed the instant motion for sanctions in the…