Kenny

Kenny v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20203:17-cv-02245California1,379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GRETCHEN CHRISTINE KENNY, Case No. 17-cv-02245-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff’s counsel, Young Cho of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, moves for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) for representing Plaintiff in her successful appeal of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“Commissioner’s”) denial of social security disability benefits. (Dkt. No. 27.) The Commissioner’s response does not oppose Plaintiff’s request for fees. After careful consideration of Plaintiff’s motion and the relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS the motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 406(b). BACKGROUND This case stems from Plaintiff’s appeal of the SSA’s denial of social security benefits for a combination of mental and physical impairments, including: status post lumbar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.