Patel

Johnson v. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20203:18-cv-00211California4,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 18-cv-00211-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v. Re: Doc. No. 51 VARSHA I. PATEL, et al., Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff Scott Johnson’s (“Johnson”) Motion for Default Judgment, brought pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and filed September 4, 2019. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of the instant motion, the Court rules as follows.2 FACTUAL BACKGROUND The following facts are taken from the Complaint: Johnson is “a level C-5 quadriplegic”; as such, he “cannot walk” and has “significant manual dexterity impairments.” (See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”), filed January 10, 2018, ¶ 1.) Johnson uses a wheelchair and a van equipped to carry it. (See id.) During the relevant time period, defendants Varsha I. Patel (“V. Patel”), Ichharambhai M. Patel (“I. Patel”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.