Garcia
Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RONALD GARCIA, Case No. 19-cv-02054-JCS
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
9 v. LEAVE TO AMEND
10 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR Re: Dkt. No. 72 COMPANY, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.
12 13 Plaintiff Ronald Garcia moves for leave to file an amended complaint eliminating claims 14 previously dismiss by the Court1 and reducing the scope of the class that he seeks to represent by 15 excluding residents of certain states. Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC 16 (“Harley-Davidson”) opposes Garcia’s motion solely on the basis that it could disrupt Harley- 17 Davidson’s motions to stay, based on the first-to-file rule, other subsequently-filed cases in the 18 states that Garcia would exclude from this action. 19 The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES 20 the hearing set for April 24, 2020. While Garcia may no longer amend by right without Harley- 21 Davidson’s consent or leave of the Court, Rule 15 of the…