Perez

Perez v. Binkele

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20203:18-cv-04856California3,519 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MATTHEW R. PEREZ, Case No. 18-cv-04856-SI

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT

9 v. BASS

10 E. MOORE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 11 Defendants.

12 13 In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Matthew Perez claims 14 that he was subjected to an unreasonable search of his body by the defendants in violation of his 15 Fourth Amendment rights. Defendant Dr. Bass moved to dismiss the complaint with respect to his 16 alleged involvement in the search of Perez. The Court granted the motion to amend and required 17 Perez to file an amended complaint. Perez then filed an amended complaint. Dr. Bass now moves 18 to dismiss the amended complaint against him. For the reasons below, the Court will dismiss Perez’s 19 claims against Dr. Bass. 20 21 BACKGROUND 22 The amended complaint alleges the following: 23 On July 31, 2016, Matthew Perez was suspected of having obtained contraband from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.