In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG

LITIGATION

8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

9 SEAL This Document Relates To: 10 ALL ACTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 710, 711, 712, 713, 722, 724, 11 726, 741, 742, 750, 751, 766, 803, 806, 828, 836, 844, 872, 888, 893, 899 12

13

14

15 Pending before the Court are the parties’ administrative motions to file under seal portions 16 of documents in connection with motions for partial summary judgment and Daubert motions 17 filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V. and U.S. Philips Corporation (collectively, “Philips”) 18 and Defendants ASUS Computer International and ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (collectively, 19 “ASUS”). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN 20 PART the motions to file under seal. 21

I. LEGAL STANDARD

22 Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal 23 documents. Pintos v. Pac.…