In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG
LITIGATION
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
SEAL This Document Relates To: 10 ALL ACTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 710, 711, 712, 713, 722, 724, 726, 741, 742, 750, 751, 766, 803, 806, 828, 836, 844, 872, 888, 893, 899
15 Pending before the Court are the parties’ administrative motions to file under seal portions 16 of documents in connection with motions for partial summary judgment and Daubert motions 17 filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V. and U.S. Philips Corporation (collectively, “Philips”) 18 and Defendants ASUS Computer International and ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (collectively, 19 “ASUS”). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN 20 PART the motions to file under seal.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
22 Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal 23 documents. Pintos v. Pac.…