Gates

Gates v. Neuschnid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20204:19-cv-07780California788 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 FREDERICK RENEE GATES, Case No. 19-cv-07780-RMI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

10 v.

11 ROBERT NEUSCHNID, 12 Defendant.

13 14 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 15 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The original petition was dismissed with leave to amend, and petitioner has 16 filed an amended petition. 17 BACKGROUND 18 Petitioner was convicted of first-degree robbery and felony domestic violence. Am. Pet. 19 (Dkt. 7) at 2. He was sentenced to 13 years in state prison. Id. at 1. The California Court of Appeal 20 affirmed the judgment, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Id. at 3. 21 DISCUSSION 22 Standard of Review 23 This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in 24 custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.