Gammage

Gammage v. City of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20203:18-cv-05604California10,832 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL GAMMAGE, Case No. 18-cv-05604-JCS

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

9 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

MOTION TO SEAL

10 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 25 & 27 Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff Michael Gammage brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state 14 law claiming that he suffered constitutional violations committed by the City and County of San 15 Francisco (“CCSF”) and San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Officers Matthew Mroz and 16 Daniel Espinoza (collectively, “Defendants”) in connection with his traffic stop and arrest on 17 October 1, 2017. Defendants now move for summary judgment. ECF No. 25. Defendants also 18 seek an order sealing videos of the traffic stop and arrest submitted in support of their motion for 19 summary judgement. ECF No. 27. A hearing was scheduled for March 20, 2020 but was vacated 20 in light of the COVID–19 emergency and General Order 72, see ECF No. 52. The matter was 21 taken under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.