Voodoo SAS v. SayGames LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20205:19-cv-07480California822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 VOODOO SAS, Case No. 19-cv-07480-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT

SAYGAMES LLC, JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY Defendant. [Re: ECF 29]

12 For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing on April 16, 2020, and discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery (ECF 29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff Voodoo SAS, a French mobile game app developer, sues Defendant SayGames LLC, a Belarusian mobile game app developer, for copyright infringement and related claims arising out of SayGames’ alleged copying of Voodoo’s mobile game app Shape Shifter 3D. See Compl., ECF 1. Voodoo alleges that SayGames’ mobile game app Jelly Shift is “a clone of Shape Shifter 3D that incorporates Shape Shifter 3D’s protectable and distinctive elements.” Compl. ¶ 2. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.