Boyzo

Boyzo v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20203:17-cv-04154California3,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESUS BOYZO, et al., Case No. 17-cv-04154-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

FCA US LLC, ATTORNEYS’ FEES

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 109

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed this action in Santa Clara Superior Court, asserting claims against Defendant FCA U.S. LLC (“FCA”) under the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Song Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code sections 1790, et seq. Defendant removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction and the parties eventually entered into a settlement agreement. Plaintiffs now bring a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses (“Fee Motion”) as the prevailing parties under California Civil Code section 1794(d). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.