Boyzo
Boyzo v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESUS BOYZO, et al., 7 Case No. 17-cv-04154-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
FCA US LLC, ATTORNEYS’ FEES
10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 109 11
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff filed this action in Santa Clara Superior Court, asserting claims against Defendant 15 FCA U.S. LLC (“FCA”) under the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Song Beverly Act”), 16 Cal. Civ. Code sections 1790, et seq. Defendant removed the action to this Court on the basis of 17 diversity jurisdiction and the parties eventually entered into a settlement agreement. Plaintiffs 18 now bring a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses (“Fee Motion”) as the prevailing 19 parties under California Civil Code section 1794(d). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable 20 for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons 21 stated below, the Motion is GRANTED in…