Faircloth
Faircloth v. AR Resources, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES FAIRCLOTH, Case No. 19-cv-05830-JCS
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
9 v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED
FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
10 AR RESOURCES, INC., JURISDICTION 11 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff James Faircloth originally brought this action in the California Superior Court for 13 Contra Costa County, where it was assigned case number L19-5208, asserting federal claims 14 under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act 15 (“FCRA”), as well as state law claims under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 16 (“RFDCPA”) and the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”). 17 Defendant AR Resources, Inc. removed to this Court based on federal question jurisdiction 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In response to AR Resource’s first motion to dismiss, Faircloth 19 filed a first amended complaint, omitting his FCRA claim and inadvertently omitting his CCRAA 20 claim. The Court granted a subsequent…