Penunuri
Penunuri v. Davis
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20203:19-cv-06112California674 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD PENUNURI, Case No. 19-cv-06112-WHO (PR)
Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY
DEDLINE; ORDER DENYING
v. MOTION FOR THE
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;
O. SMITH, et al., ORDER DISMSSING TWO
DEFENDANTS; ORDER SETTING
Defendants. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Dkt. Nos. 15 and 19 This order addresses two pending motions, dismisses two unserved defendants, and sets a dispositive motion deadline. (i) Defendants’ motion to extend the discovery production deadline to June 21, 2020 is GRANTED. (Dkt. No. 19.) (ii) Plaintiff Penunuri’s moves for the appointment of counsel. (Dkt. No. 15.) The decision to request counsel to represent an indigent litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is within “the sound discretion of the trial court and is granted only in exceptional circumstances.” Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984). A finding of …