United States v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20203:11-cv-00941California1,683 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Case No. 11-cv-00941-EMC

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING RELATORS’

9 v. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

10 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., Docket No. 281 11 Defendants.

12 13 14 Currently pending before the Court is the Campies’ motion for approval of a voluntary 15 dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). In their motion, the Campies 16 essentially ask the Court to dismiss the instant case – which at present consists of a federal 17 retaliation claim, several California retaliation claims, and a number of state/local FCA claims1 18 (including but not limited to one based on California law) – so that they may pursue a narrower 19 case in California state court. That narrower case would consist of California retaliation claims 20 and a California-only FCA claim. In other words, the Campies would no longer be pursuing (1) a 21 federal retaliation claim and (2) state/local FCA claims other than one based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.