Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20205:16-cv-06370California1,948 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Case No. 5-16-ev-06370-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING CELESTRON’S 10 v. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., Re: Dkt. No. 564 1 LTD., et al., 2 Defendants. 13 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), third-party Celestron Acquisition LLC 14 || (‘Celestron Acquisition”), moves this Court for clarification regarding the Court’s January 17, 3 15 || 2020 order granting in part and denying in part Optronic Technologies, Inc.’s (“Orion”) motion a 16 || for assignment and turnover (Dkt. No. 559, “Assignment Order”). The Court takes the matter 17 || under submission for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the Z 18 || reasons below, Celestron Acquisition’s motion is GRANTED. 19 I. Background 20 On January 13, 2020, Orion served Celestron Acquisition with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.