Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20205:17-cv-04467California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 249 Defendant.

13 In connection with a discovery dispute concerning defendant SonicWall, Inc.’s requests to obtain documents from another action that plaintiff Finjan, Inc. contends are protected under the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine (Dkt. No. 248), SonicWall filed an administrative motion to file portions of the parties’ joint discovery dispute letter and an associated exhibit under seal. Dkt. No. 249. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court grants the administrative motion, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of “compelling reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.