Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20203:18-cv-02621California4,639 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 18-cv-02621-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

9 v. CERTIFY THE ORDER ENTERED AT

DKT. NO. 247 FOR INTERLOCUTORY

10 CHECK POINT SOFTWARE APPEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 263 Defendants.

12

13 In this patent infringement case, plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) accuses defendant Check 14 Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (collectively 15 “Check Point”) of infringing on several of its patents related to cyber security. There have been 16 three rounds of infringement contentions in this case. On January 17, 2020, I granted in part 17 Check Point’s motion to strike Finjan’s second amended infringement contentions (“SAICs”), 18 which amounted to 5,135 charts, totaling to over 185,000 pages. See Order Granting in Part 19 Motion to Strike Second Amended Infringement Contentions; Granting in Part Motions to Seal 20 (the “SAIC Order”) [Dkt. No. 247]. Given the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.