In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8

IN RE: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER

9 LITIGATION Case No. 18-cv-01586-JSC

10

ORDER NO. 2. RE: JOINT

11 DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF ON

SITRICK & CO. AND K2

12 COMMUNICATIONS SUBPOENAS 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 422 & 426

14 15 The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief regarding Plaintiffs’ subpoenas to non-parties 16 Sitrick & Co. and Krupp Communications. (Dkt. No. 422.) Defendants Pacific MSO and Prelude 17 Fertility (“Defendants” for purposes of this Order) retained these public relations entities prior to 18 (in the case of Krupp Communications) and following the March 4 incident. Defendants have 19 possession of the documents subpoenaed from Sitrick & Co. and Krupp Communications. Of 20 these documents, Defendants have produced 101 documents and withheld 190 documents on the 21 basis of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine. Based on Plaintiffs’ review of the 22 privilege log, Plaintiffs…