In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20203:18-cv-01586California1,495 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER
LITIGATION Case No. 18-cv-01586-JSC
ORDER NO. 2. RE: JOINT
DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF ON
SITRICK & CO. AND K2
COMMUNICATIONS SUBPOENAS Re: Dkt. Nos. 422 & 426
14 The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief regarding Plaintiffs’ subpoenas to non-parties Sitrick & Co. and Krupp Communications. (Dkt. No. 422.) Defendants Pacific MSO and Prelude Fertility (“Defendants” for purposes of this Order) retained these public relations entities prior to (in the case of Krupp Communications) and following the March 4 incident. Defendants have possession of the documents subpoenaed from Sitrick & Co. and Krupp Communications. Of these documents, Defendants have produced 101 documents and withheld 190 documents on the basis of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine. Based on Plaintiffs’ review of the privilege log, Plaintiffs…