In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20203:18-cv-01586California1,495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER

LITIGATION Case No. 18-cv-01586-JSC

ORDER NO. 2. RE: JOINT

DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF ON

SITRICK & CO. AND K2

COMMUNICATIONS SUBPOENAS Re: Dkt. Nos. 422 & 426

14 The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief regarding Plaintiffs’ subpoenas to non-parties Sitrick & Co. and Krupp Communications. (Dkt. No. 422.) Defendants Pacific MSO and Prelude Fertility (“Defendants” for purposes of this Order) retained these public relations entities prior to (in the case of Krupp Communications) and following the March 4 incident. Defendants have possession of the documents subpoenaed from Sitrick & Co. and Krupp Communications. Of these documents, Defendants have produced 101 documents and withheld 190 documents on the basis of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine. Based on Plaintiffs’ review of the privilege log, Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.