Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20205:18-cv-01223California6,440 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 18-cv-01223-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED

11 CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 126

13 14 Plaintiff Satish Ramachandran sues defendants City of Los Altos (“Los Altos”) and 15 individual Los Altos employees for violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights 16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 92. Mr. Ramachandran now seeks leave to file a fourth 17 amended and supplemental complaint. Dkt. No. 126. The Court heard oral argument on Mr. 18 Ramachandran’s motion on April 7, 2020. Dkt. No. 139. 19 All parties who have appeared have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. Nos. 20 11, 22. Having considered the parties’ briefs and the arguments made at the hearing, for the 21 following reasons, the Court grants in part and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.