Arendas

Arendas v. Altizer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20203:20-cv-02041California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER JOHN ARENDAS, #36554, Case No. 20-cv-02041-CRB (PR) Plaintiff, y. ORDER OF DISMISSAL KEITH ALTIZER, ll Defendant(s). Plaintiff has filed a letter advising the clerk that he “will be dismissing” this action “as per FRCP41(a)(1)(A)” and that “this letter should suffice as per the rule.” Letter (ECF No. 5) at 1. S 14 || The letter is construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)@) and, pursuant thereto, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See American z 16 || Soccer Co. v. Score First Enters., 187 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 1999) (plaintiff's “‘absolute right” || to dismiss his action voluntarily before defendants serve answer or motion for summary judgment 18 || leaves no role for court to play). The clerk is directed to close the case and terminate all pending motions as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. || Dated: April 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.