Trump

Trump v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20205:18-cv-06413California5,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CANDY TRUMP, Case No. 18-CV-06413-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v.

MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE THE

EXPERT OPINIONS OF DR. HELEN

INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC., SALSBURY AND MR. ROGER ODELL Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 62 17 Plaintiff Candy Trump (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging negligence, products liability, and strict liability claims arising from alleged defects in Defendant’s da Vinci robotic surgery system. ECF No. 19 (“Am. Compl.”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motions to exclude the expert opinions of Dr. Helen Salsbury, ECF No. 61 (“Salsbury Mot.”), and Mr. Roger Odell, ECF No. 62 (“Odell Mot.”). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Defendant’s motions to exclude. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.