Trump

Trump v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20205:18-cv-06413California5,967 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 CANDY TRUMP, Case No. 18-CV-06413-LHK

13 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

14 v.

MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE THE

EXPERT OPINIONS OF DR. HELEN

15 INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC., SALSBURY AND MR. ROGER ODELL 16 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 62 17 18 Plaintiff Candy Trump (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendant Intuitive Surgical, 19 Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging negligence, products liability, and strict liability claims arising from 20 alleged defects in Defendant’s da Vinci robotic surgery system. ECF No. 19 (“Am. Compl.”). 21 Before the Court is Defendant’s motions to exclude the expert opinions of Dr. Helen Salsbury, 22 ECF No. 61 (“Salsbury Mot.”), and Mr. Roger Odell, ECF No. 62 (“Odell Mot.”). Having 23 considered the parties’ briefs, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES in 24 part and GRANTS in part Defendant’s motions to exclude. 25 I. BACKGROUND 26 A. Factual Background…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.