Chung

Global Industrial Investment Limited v. Chung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20205:19-cv-07670California3,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT Case No. 19-CV-07670-LHK

LIMITED,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff,

REMAND AND REQUEST FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS

v. Re: Dkt. No.

ANDREW CHUNG,

16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Global Industrial Investment Limited (“Plaintiff”) brings suit against Defendant Andrew Chung (“Defendant”) for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and “tort of another.” ECF No. 1-1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand and request for attorney’s fees and costs. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to remand and request for attorney’s fees and costs. I. BACKGROUND 25 26 1 Plaintiff’s motion to remand includes a notice of motion that is separate from the memorandum of points and authorities. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and points and authorities should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.