Bey
Bey v. Malec
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAQ BEY, Case No. 18-cv-02626-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
JARED MALEC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 100 Defendants.
12 On March 6, 2020 defendants Jared Malec, Kevin Goodman, Ronald Shepard, Dino Cristiani and Andrew Yu (collectively “defendants”) filed the instant motion for summary judgment arguing there are no material issues of fact regarding plaintiff Raq Bey’s only remaining cause of action for excessive force. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion. 19 BACKGROUND1 On October 31, 2017 around 11:00 p.m., Plaintiff Raq Bey was driving his vehicle in Emeryville, California on 40th Avenue. Dkt. No. 1 at 152 (Complaint); Dkt. No. 100 at 7 (Motion for Summary…