Housh

Housh v. Rackley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20204:17-cv-04222California1,287 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARLOS C. HOUSH, Case No. 17-cv-04222-HSG

8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

AMEND PETITION TO ADD CLAIM

9 v. OF SENTENCING ERROR

10 RONALD RACKLEY, Re: Dkt. No. 65 11 Respondent.

12 13 Petitioner, a pro se prisoner, filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 14 U.S.C. § 2254. Now pending before the Court is petitioner’s request that the Court amend his 15 petition to add a claim of sentencing error. Dkt. No. 65. Petitioner has filed an amended petition 16 that contains only the claim that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 17 (“CDCR”) erred in calculating his sentence when it failed to remove the five-year enhancement. 18 Dkt. No. 66. Petitioner’s request that the Court amend his petition for him by considering the 19 sentencing calculation error claim set forth in Dkt. No. 66 in addition to the claims set forth in the 20 operative petition, docketed at Dkt. No. 1, is DENIED for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.