Parziale

Parziale v. HP, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20205:19-cv-05363California8,928 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

JOHN PARZIALE,

8 Case No. 5:19-cv-05363-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR

HP, INC, STRIKE

Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 25 g i

13 This putative nation-wide class action suit arises out of Defendant HP Inc.’s (“HP” or

14 || “Defendant”) implementation of a remote firmware update that allegedly incapacitated Plaintiff

3 15 || John Parziale’s (“Plaintiff”) HP printers and thirty-three other models of HP printers by preventing QO 16 || the use of certain non-HP ink cartridges in those printers.

17 On November 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Class Action Complaint (Dkt.

18 || No. 19, “FAC”). HP now moves to dismiss the FAC pursuant to Rules 8(a)(2), 9(b), 12(b)(6), and 19 12(f) of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.