Trujillo-Cruz

Trujillo-Cruz v. Tincher

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20204:20-cv-02714California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO-CRUZ, Case No. 20-cv-02714-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Re: Dkt. No.

S. TINCHER, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court orders plaintiff to show cause why his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. DISCUSSION This action is governed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”) which was enacted, and became effective, on April 26, 1996. The PLRA provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, i.e., may not proceed in forma pauperis, “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.