Inostroz

Inostroz v. Eldridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20204:17-cv-05577California298 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MIGUEL CARDONA INOSTROZ, Case No. 17-cv-05577-HSG

8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY; DENYING LEAVE

9 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ON APPEAL

10 LAURA ELDRIDGE,1 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 20, 22 11 Respondent.

12 13 Petitioner, a pro se prisoner, filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 14 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 21, 2020, the Court denied the habeas petition, denied a certificate of 15 appealability and entered judgment in favor of respondent. Dkt. Nos. 11, 12. Now pending before 16 the Court are petitioner’s requests for a certificate of appealability (Dkt. Nos. 20, 22) and 17 petitioner’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Dkt. No. 18). A certificate 18 of appealability is DENIED for the same reasons set forth in the Court’s January 21, 2020 order 19 denying the habeas petition. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing that a reasonable jurist 20 would find the denial of his petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.