Inostroz

Inostroz v. Eldridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20204:17-cv-05577California298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MIGUEL CARDONA INOSTROZ, Case No. 17-cv-05577-HSG

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY; DENYING LEAVE

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ON APPEAL

LAURA ELDRIDGE,1 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 20, 22 Respondent.

12 Petitioner, a pro se prisoner, filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 21, 2020, the Court denied the habeas petition, denied a certificate of appealability and entered judgment in favor of respondent. Dkt. Nos. 11, 12. Now pending before the Court are petitioner’s requests for a certificate of appealability (Dkt. Nos. 20, 22) and petitioner’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Dkt. No. 18). A certificate of appealability is DENIED for the same reasons set forth in the Court’s January 21, 2020 order denying the habeas petition. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing that a reasonable jurist would find the denial of his petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.