Jackson v. Ceva Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BYRON JACKSON, Case No. 19-CV-07657-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 CEVA LOGISTICS, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Byron Jackson (“Plaintiff”) brings suit against Defendants CEVA LOGISTICS (“CEVA”), RANDSTAD INC. (“Randstad”), and TESLA MOTORS (“Tesla”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to remand.1 I. BACKGROUND

1 Plaintiff’s motion to remand contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. See ECF No. 20 at i-ii. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of…