RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RINGCENTRAL, INC., Case No. 19-cv-02626-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS NEXTIVA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendants. 15 16 In this business defamation lawsuit, defendants Nextiva, Inc. and UnitedWeb, Inc. move to dismiss plaintiff RingCentral Inc.’s second amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 57. Defendants argue that RingCentral still fails to allege facts supporting its claims. In its amended complaint, RingCentral now alleges sufficient facts to support its claims, but still fails to establish an alter ego relationship between the two Defendants. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. Background A. Allegations in the Second Amended Complaint The facts alleged in the complaint are considered true…