Ketroser

Ketroser v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20203:19-cv-05231California1,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEIDRE KELLOGG KETROSER, Case No. 19-cv-05231-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

7-ELEVEN, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff Dierdre Kellogg Ketroser’s (“Kellogg Ketroser”) “Motion,” filed April 2, 2020, “for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint.” Defendants have filed opposition, to which Kellogg Ketroser has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the parties’ written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 8, 2020, and rules as follows: On August 21, 2019, David B. Ketroser (“Dr. Ketroser”) filed the initial complaint in the above-titled action, asserting therein a federal claim for denial of access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and four state law claims for denial of access under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.