Zerpa

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, Case No. 19-cv-02791-HSG

INC.,

8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR 9 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 36, 37 PEDRO ZERPA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment for 14 which briefing is complete. Dkt. Nos. 36 (“ISM Mot.”), 37 (“FPG Mot.”), 38 (“ISM Opp.”), 40 15 (“FPG Reply). Plaintiff Integrated Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media 16 (“ISM”) initially sought a summary judgment of liability under 47 U.S.C. Section 605, as well as 17 under a theory of common law conversion, for the interception and broadcast of a soccer game by 18 Defendants Pedro Zerpa (“Zerpa”), Julio Antonio Martinez “(“Martinez”), and Fusion Peruvian 19 Grill Corporation d/b/a Fusion Peruvian Grill (“FPG”). Defendants cross-moved for summary 20 judgment, conceding that FPG is liable…