Zerpa

Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Zerpa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20204:19-cv-02791California5,532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, Case No. 19-cv-02791-HSG

INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Re: Dkt. No. 36, 37 PEDRO ZERPA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment for which briefing is complete. Dkt. Nos. 36 (“ISM Mot.”), 37 (“FPG Mot.”), 38 (“ISM Opp.”), 40 (“FPG Reply). Plaintiff Integrated Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media (“ISM”) initially sought a summary judgment of liability under 47 U.S.C. Section 605, as well as under a theory of common law conversion, for the interception and broadcast of a soccer game by Defendants Pedro Zerpa (“Zerpa”), Julio Antonio Martinez “(“Martinez”), and Fusion Peruvian Grill Corporation d/b/a Fusion Peruvian Grill (“FPG”). Defendants cross-moved for summary judgment, conceding that FPG is liable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.