Hyams

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 EUREKA DIVISION 4 5 RYAN HYAMS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06278-HSG (RMI)

6 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON DISCOVERY

7 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 69 8 CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., 9 Defendants.

10 11 On March 31, 2020, the undersigned held a hearing on several discovery disputes and 12 resolved all but one issue regarding a deposition topic upon which the parties were instructed to 13 submit supplemental briefing (dkt. 59). The parties submitted a joint supplemental letter brief (dkt. 14 67), and Defendants submitted a separate brief to address an argument that Plaintiffs did not 15 include in the version they exchanged with Defendants prior to filing (dkt. 69).1 The outstanding 16 discovery dispute concerns whether Plaintiffs are entitled to inquire about the cost of full-time 17 employee benefits. See Jt. Ltr. Br. (dkt. 56) at 7-8. In their portion of the brief, Plaintiffs argue that 18 the benefits information is discoverable as relevant compensation which they may be due as 19 …