Hovsepian

Hovsepian v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20204:19-cv-04692California1,878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARMIK A. HOVSEPIAN, Case No. 19-cv-04692-HSG

Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

JOSIE GASTELO, Respondent.

12 Petitioner, an inmate at California Men’s Colony – East, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his 1994 conviction for attempted murder. Dkt. No. 1. On November 27, 2019, the Court ordered petitioner to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Dkt. No. 8. On January 16, 2020, the Court granted petitioner an extension of time to March 30, 2020 to file his answer. Dkt. No. 10. The deadline to answer the order to show cause has passed, and petitioner has not answered. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES the petition as untimely. DISCUSSION I. Procedural Background According to the petition, in 1994, petitioner was convicted by a Santa Clara County jury of two counts of attempted murder with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.